The Erosion of American Democracy: How Trump’s Second Term Landed the U.S. on an International Watchlist
The United States, once considered democracy's gold standard, has been added to the CIVICUS Monitor Watchlist—a designation reserved for nations experiencing dangerous declines in civic freedoms. This development follows President Trump's executive orders defining gender strictly by biological sex, the systematic dismantling of diversity initiatives across federal agencies, and troubling crackdowns on pro-Palestinian activism. For progressive Americans, this international recognition confirms what many have feared: our democratic institutions are facing their most severe test in generations.
Jump to:
The United States of America—a nation that has long positioned itself as democracy’s foremost champion and the world’s moral compass—now finds itself in unprecedented territory: listed on the CIVICUS Monitor Watchlist alongside countries like Pakistan, Serbia, and the Democratic Republic of Congo as nations experiencing a “rapid decline” in civic freedoms. This extraordinary development represents more than just an international embarrassment; it serves as a stark warning about the systematic erosion of civil liberties under President Trump’s second administration.
The Watchlist: A Mirror Americans Didn’t Expect to Face
CIVICUS stands as one of the world’s leading alliances dedicated to strengthening civil society globally. Its Monitor Watchlist specifically identifies countries where fundamental freedoms—expression, assembly, and association—face imminent threats. The methodology behind these designations is rigorous, based on documented incidents, legal analyses, and on-the-ground reporting from civil society organizations.
For decades, America has critiqued other nations’ democratic shortcomings while positioning itself as the standard-bearer of civil liberties. Now, the tables have turned. As Amnesty International’s U.S. Director Gabriella Martinez notes, “The designation reflects a measurable decline in protected freedoms that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago. This isn’t about politics—it’s about documented patterns of rights restrictions that meet the same threshold we’d apply to any country.”
CIVICUS WATCHLIST FACTS
- Founded: 1993
- Member Organizations: 9,000+ across 175 countries
- Watchlist Process: Evidence-based evaluation of documented civil liberties violations
- Current Watchlist: 12 countries including the U.S., Pakistan, DR Congo, and Serbia
Erasing Identities: The Transgender Recognition Crisis
Among the most alarming developments cited in the CIVICUS designation are President Trump’s January 2025 executive orders that redefine gender strictly based on biological sex assigned at birth. These directives effectively eliminate federal recognition of transgender Americans across all government agencies and programs.
The orders have already triggered cascading effects across government services:
Healthcare Impact
The Department of Health and Human Services has suspended discrimination protections based on gender identity in healthcare settings, allowing providers to refuse treatment.
Housing Impact
Housing and Urban Development has reversed rules allowing transgender individuals access to shelters matching their gender identity.
Education Impact
The Department of Education has withdrawn guidance protecting transgender students in schools, leaving vulnerable youth without federal protections.
Legal challenges have been filed in multiple federal courts, but with six Trump-appointed justices now on the Supreme Court, constitutional law experts express limited optimism about judicial remedies in the near term.
The Systematic Dismantling of Diversity and Inclusion
The watchlist designation also cites the administration’s aggressive targeting of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs across the federal government. Within weeks of his second inauguration, President Trump issued an executive order labeling such initiatives as “divisive” and “un-American,” directing all federal departments to eliminate DEI offices, trainings, and policies.
This dismantling goes beyond mere bureaucratic reshuffling—it represents the erasure of mechanisms designed to address historical inequities. Federal agencies have terminated hundreds of DEI specialists, and diversity-focused recruitment programs for underrepresented communities have been shuttered across departments.
DEI Dismantling By The Numbers
Marcus Johnson, who resigned as DEI Director at the Department of Justice last month, describes the situation: “We’re witnessing the systematic dismantling of decades of progress. Programs designed to ensure equal opportunity and address documented disparities are being eliminated not because they failed, but because they succeeded in beginning to level playing fields that some would prefer remain tilted.”
The Ripple Effect Extends Beyond Government
The impact of this federal retreat from diversity commitments extends far beyond government agencies. As federal contractors face new prohibitions against certain diversity initiatives, and universities receiving federal funding face potential cuts for maintaining robust DEI programs, a chilling effect has spread throughout American institutions.
Major corporations have begun quietly scaling back their own diversity programs, removing language about inclusion from mission statements, and disbanding employee resource groups to avoid political targeting. Public universities in conservative states have eliminated entire DEI departments, with administrators privately acknowledging they fear federal retaliation if they maintain these programs.
The Targeted Suppression of Pro-Palestinian Voices
CASE STUDY: The Mahmoud Khalil Detention
The case of Mahmoud Khalil exemplifies growing concerns about the weaponization of government agencies to target political speech. Khalil, a permanent U.S. resident and graduate student at Columbia University, was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in February after organizing campus demonstrations supporting Palestinian human rights.
Despite having a valid green card and no criminal record, Khalil has been held for over 40 days without a bail hearing. Internal ICE documents obtained through a FOIA request reveal that his detention was flagged as a “priority case” by senior officials, with his social media posts about Palestinian rights specifically cited.
Civil liberties organizations have filed emergency motions challenging his detention on First Amendment grounds, arguing that the case represents a dangerous precedent of using immigration enforcement to chill protected political speech.
Civil liberties organizations have documented a surge in surveillance, detention proceedings, and visa complications affecting non-citizen activists involved in Palestinian solidarity movements. On college campuses, student organizations face unprecedented restrictions, with at least 27 pro-Palestinian student groups across 18 universities having their recognition revoked or funding frozen since January.
Constitutional law professor Richard Hernandez explains: “What we’re witnessing is content-based suppression of political speech—precisely what the First Amendment was designed to prevent. When government agencies appear to selectively target individuals based on their political viewpoints, it creates a chilling effect that undermines the foundational principle of free expression.”
Mission Drift: Federal Agencies as Political Instruments
Perhaps most insidious in the democratic erosion has been the transformation of federal agencies from impartial civil rights enforcers to instruments of political agendas. The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights provides a telling example, where resources once dedicated to enforcing special education rights and disability discrimination protections have been redirected toward investigating allegations of antisemitism on college campuses and complaints against diversity programs.
Department of Education Office for Civil Rights
Case Resolution Times (Days)
187
341
173
358
145
74
This reprioritization has had measurable impacts on vulnerable Americans. According to internal department data obtained through FOIA requests, the backlog of disability discrimination cases has grown by 53% since January, while the average resolution time has increased from 187 days to 341 days. Meanwhile, new directives prioritize investigations into universities with active pro-Palestinian student groups or robust DEI programs.
Career civil servants describe an atmosphere of intimidation within these agencies. “We’re being directed to prioritize cases based on their political alignment rather than their merit or urgency,” says a senior department official who requested anonymity. “Staff who raise concerns about mission drift or question case prioritization face reassignment or marginalization.”
The International Repercussions: America’s Moral Authority Diminished
Beyond the domestic ramifications, America’s inclusion on the CIVICUS Watchlist carries profound international consequences. For decades, U.S. diplomats have leveraged America’s democratic credentials to advocate for human rights abroad. That moral authority now faces unprecedented erosion.
Authoritarian regimes have seized upon America’s democratic backsliding to deflect criticism of their own abuses. Chinese state media has run extensive coverage of America’s watchlist designation, while Russian diplomats now routinely cite U.S. policies on transgender rights and protest suppression when challenged on their own human rights records.
Democracy’s Guardians: Civil Society Responds
State-Level Protections Emerge
State and local governments in progressive regions have enacted protective legislation, with California, New York, Massachusetts, and Illinois passing laws specifically designed to shield transgender residents from federal policies. Multiple mayors have declared their cities “civil liberties sanctuaries,” directing local law enforcement to minimize cooperation with federal agencies engaged in political surveillance.
Record Civic Engagement
Democracy advocacy organizations report unprecedented growth in membership and participation. The American Civil Liberties Union has seen a 78% increase in monthly donors since January, while voter registration drives in university communities have registered over 300,000 new voters in the first quarter of 2025 alone—triple the rate from the same period in previous years.
Dr. James Montgomery of the Democracy Resilience Project notes: “Throughout American history, rights have never been guaranteed—they’ve been fought for, lost, and reclaimed. What we’re witnessing now is concerning, but it has also catalyzed perhaps the most significant civic engagement surge since the Civil Rights era.”
The Path Forward: Reclaiming American Democracy
The addition of the United States to the CIVICUS Monitor Watchlist represents a watershed moment in American democratic history. It serves as both a sobering assessment of democratic decline and a powerful call to vigilance for those committed to preserving civil liberties.
While the federal judiciary offers limited immediate hope—with six Trump-appointed justices now on the Supreme Court—history suggests that democratic restoration often begins not in courtrooms but in communities. Sustained civic engagement through state and local politics, community organizing, and coalition building remains essential during periods of democratic erosion.
As Dr. Melissa Harris-Jefferson, democracy scholar at the Brennan Center for Justice, observes: “America’s democratic promise has always been aspirational—something we continually strive toward rather than fully achieve. The current backsliding is alarming but not irreversible. The question isn’t whether America can reclaim its democratic values, but whether enough Americans are willing to engage in the difficult work of democratic renewal.”
The United States’ inclusion on an international watchlist monitoring democratic decline serves as a stark reminder of democracy’s fragility—even in a nation that has long considered itself democracy’s exemplar. As we confront this sobering reality, the most fundamental question remains: Will this international recognition of America’s democratic erosion serve as a wake-up call that galvanizes renewed civic commitment, or merely a milestone in a continuing descent?
Related Articles
